WWE on Muchnick’s CHRIS & NANCY — The Twitter Daily Dozen for November 1

For a live feed of this continuing series, follow @irvmuch at Twitter.

PARTS 385 – 396

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 385 but it does not attempt to weasle out of or undermine the retraction, which is all that’s germane

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 386 * Under the same principle as the publication of your complete email of yesterday (“more is

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 387 more”), I also am happy to publish subsequent to my second post an additional email by you

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 388 including the text of your paragraph beginning “Secondly,” as well as, perhaps, other general

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 389 commentary about whatever you find unsatisfactory about me

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 390 and my style of running corrections.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 391 Jerry McDevitt email to Irvin Muchnick, 6/18/09 4:05 p.m., “RE: Muchnick to McDevitt”

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 392 It was not my email of yesterday that you proposed to publish in less than complete fashion.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 393 It was the one this morning. As to the rest, you have my position on the adequacy

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 394 of your purported retraction and what is needed here. I do not intend to comment further,

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 395 and will do what is warranted when I see what you now do.

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 396 Irvin Muchnick email to Jerry McDevitt, 6/18/09 4:33 p.m., “RE: Muchnick to McDevitt”