Monday, October 12, 2009

WWE on Muchnick’s CHRIS & NANCY — The Twitter Daily Dozen for October 12

For a live feed of this continuing series, follow @irvmuch at Twitter.

PARTS 145 – 156

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 145 raised questions about how promptly WWE acted on the information given to it by the Albany

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 146 district attorney, and how consistently the Wellness Program in general has been executed

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 147 I do not quite see the point of your complaint about my commentary on Dr. Astin’s indictment;

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 148 the essence of the commentary is my wondering aloud why charges related to steroids were not part

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 149 of the indictment. For your part, you offer an articulate argument for the prosecutorial

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 150 discretion that was exercised here. 3. Civil litigation. Nowhere have I said that there is a civil

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 151 lawsuit on file against WWE, so I do not understand your complaint. Thank you for the background

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 152 on estate law and pointers to further areas of reporting. 4. Fayette County authorities –

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 153 threat or menace? Your comments on the Fayette County investigation are valuable additions

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 154 to the public record. WWE’s vice president for corporate communications, Gary Davis, long ago

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 155 stopped responding to my communications. I am happy to have a direct conduit of future

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 156 communications. 5. WWE’s head start. Analysis of telephone call transaction data indicates that

No comments: