WWE on Muchnick’s CHRIS & NANCY — The Twitter Daily Dozen for October 27

For a live feed of this continuing series, follow @irvmuch at Twitter.

PARTS 325 – 336

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 325 on the 30th and the morning of the 31st at WWE headquarters, and the disciplinary action taken

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 326 was immediately announced.” I immediately responded to McDevitt that I would investigate

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 327 the matter, get back to him, and take appropriate action. I later sought his approval of the text

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 328 of the retraction and apology, which is published in the previous post, and shared with him

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 329 a draft of this follow-up blog item. As noted by McDevitt and directly quoted in my item,

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 330 the source for the information about the timing of WWE’s action in the Signature Pharmacy matter

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 331 was Dave Meltzer’s Wrestling Observer Newsletter. Meltzer is regarded as the foremost journalist

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 332 in his field, and has been described by the distinguished writer Frank Deford as “the most

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 333 accomplished reporter in sports journalism.” The Observer has become widely recognized

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 334 as the industry’s unofficial journal of record. Whenever I acquire information from the Observer

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 335 that was not evidently elsewhere in the public record, my practice is to seek to confirm it

WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 336 with the parties if possible. In this instance, I did not consider that a viable possibility