For a live feed of this continuing series, follow @irvmuch at Twitter.
PARTS 253 – 264
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 253 at the meeting with the DA or of the subsequent discussions with the DA. Thus, based on Meltzer’s
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 254 false and incorrect statement that “The company was given the list of names at the meeting,
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 255 which took place two weeks before Summerslam”, you accuse me of provided a false and misleading
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 256 account. The meeting with the District Attorney did take place on Aug 14th, but we were not given
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 257 the names of any talent who had dealt with Signature at that meeting, as Meltzer and now
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 258 you have falsely reported. Instead, the DA asked if WWE would take any action if they did provide
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 259 their information to us, and I told him I was quite sure the company would do so but would confirm
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 260 that and get back to him to that effect, which was done by email the next day. The day that
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 261 information was finally provided to us, which was Aug 29th, the named talent were summoned
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 262 to be interviewed immediately at WWE headquarters. Those interviews were conducted on the 30th
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 263 and the morning of the 31st at WWE headquarters, and the disciplinary action taken was
WWE on Muchnick’s ‘CHRIS & NANCY’ Pt. 264 immediately announced. Your other headline treatment of the factual information provided to you
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment